Greek MPs question CO₂ storage project in Prinos, warn of environmental risks
Eight lawmakers from Nea Aristera have submitted a parliamentary question raising serious concerns over a proposed carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Prinos, arguing that the initiative risks being misrepresented as part of Greece’s “green transition.”
Criticism of CCS as a Climate Solution
The initiative was led by Peti Perka, head of the party’s parliamentary group, who, along with fellow MPs, questioned the effectiveness of CCS technology in tackling the climate crisis.
The lawmakers argue that carbon capture and storage does not address emissions at their source but instead delays and relocates the problem, allowing continued pollution while presenting an appearance of environmental action.
Concerns Over Project Framing and Funding
The Prinos project—located in northern Greece—has been promoted as a “green infrastructure” initiative. However, MPs pointed out that it is being implemented by a hydrocarbon extraction company and supported by significant public and European funding.
They described the investment as costly and potentially counterproductive, suggesting it may serve as justification for prolonging fossil fuel activities rather than accelerating decarbonization.
Environmental and Seismic Risks Highlighted
The MPs emphasized potential environmental dangers associated with the project, particularly given the seismic activity in the region. They warned of possible CO₂ leaks, which could have severe consequences for marine ecosystems and the local economy.
Additional concerns were raised over the project’s location within a Natura 2000 protected area, heightening fears of irreversible environmental damage.
Public Opposition and Legal Challenges
The parliamentary question also pointed to strong local opposition, including public protests and legal appeals filed with the Council of State (Greece). According to the MPs, this reflects a lack of social legitimacy for the project.
Gaps in Environmental Impact Assessment
Lawmakers criticized the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), arguing that it fails to provide adequate and quantified risk analysis, including indirect greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 3). They claim this omission contradicts international scientific standards and evolving legal frameworks.
Questions on EU Climate Compliance
The MPs further questioned whether the project aligns with European climate legislation and the precautionary principle, citing the uncertainties and potential risks involved.
Call for Transparency and Reassessment
In their submission, the MPs requested clear answers from the Ministry of Environment and Energy regarding:
- The actual effectiveness of CCS technology
- Safety measures and leakage risks
- Completeness of environmental assessments
- Impact on marine ecosystems and protected areas
- Greece’s broader decarbonization strategy
They concluded that the Prinos project should not be presented as part of a genuine green transition, calling instead for greater transparency, scientific scrutiny, and democratic oversight.
